hadriel | three ☠ text

Entry tags:

three ☠ text

Some of you just can't seem to stop being upset over my methods. While I'm sure Rage is more than happy to let this continue, I'm here to propose a compromise.

I've noticed that many of you feel fear while asleep. After a time, I've discerned that this is due to hallucinations occurring while you are immobile, and I've decided to allow you all to experience more of these frightful hallucinations.

I think that sounds workable. You aren't put into any real physical danger, and I still get power. And, if you can see one another's hallucinations then you'll have more people who frightened of the same thing, which makes my job easier in the long run.

A handsome compromise, yes? Good?

Done.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Not exactly my most pressing concern but likely, yes.

So why go through with it?

Your fear is worth your disdain, many times over.

Isn't there a more efficient way to get what you want from us?

Yes: I have you experience the nightmarish things while awake. Many of you have issue with that.

What I meant is whether there's a more efficient way to get what you want without subjecting people to things they object to.

Oh!

Definitely not.

Sounds to me like you're not terribly creative.

Sounds to me like you don't know how my abilities work.

[Well, since you brought it up ...]

Then enlighten me.

It has to be real. Genuine. The deeper you feel it, or the more of you who feel it, the better it works. Dreams are alright, but not as effective as reality.

If you agree to it, you won't feel as afraid. There'll be some manner of confidence in your approach- a safeguard, if you will.

So you're saying that if I give you permission to scare me, I won't actually feel as scared as if I refuse? That seems ... backwards.

How is that backwards? It's the very nature of fear.

And, unfortunately, why I doubt I'll ever be as well-loved as Delight.

It seems backwards that you would suggest it as a strategy. Isn't it more to your benefit if we're more scared rather than less?

[Mello's just not even gonna touch that popularity contest nonsense.]

Yes. And you'll be more frightened if you don't agree to be frightened.

Is that not the case?

If what you've said is correct, then yes. But it seems you're working against yourself by offering that suggestion to us. One would naturally assume that you would want to maximize your gain from us.

If you're trying to convince me to nix the nightmare idea and resume torturing you all in reality, then you're doing a fantastic job.

No, that's not my aim at all. I'm just trying to understand you.

I'm simply attempting a compromise in the fruitless hope that you will all stop complaining quite so much and leave us be.

Got a little more than you expected with us, didn't you?

I can't say the result has been entirely predicted.

That's the fun thing about humans. Sometimes, we're entirely predictable, and other times, we're not. There's also really no telling which of those you're going to get.

Yes, I've learned that.

Some of you are pleasant to have around, at least.

By what criteria do you categorize those who are pleasant and those who are not?

Well, the unpleasant ones are typically hellbent on killing me.

I like it when others are willing to talk, though. Learning about your worlds is fascinating.

three ☠ text

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.

text.