Dr. Lance Sweets (
lifetothefullest) wrote in
hadriel2018-10-19 05:55 pm
Entry tags:
014 [Video] /dated to a few hours after Yusuke's anon post
[Lance looks a little over life at the moment, which most of his friends probably recognize as his standard look when not being purposefully professional. He's not bothering with the latter right now, both because he's a bit annoyed and because he thinks it would be pointless, so instead everyone gets normal, slightly bitchy Lance.]
Okay, I wish I could say that I can't believe I have to remind people of this, but vigilante justice is not exactly the best idea here. Not only is it morally wrong to just declare yourself to have the authority to decide who is and isn't deserving of 'justice', but it's logically wrong too; you're just going to cause problems, not solve them.
I'm not saying not to intervene when something's actively happening, but going after someone days or weeks later is just starting the whole process of retaliation all over again. So can everyone just take their egos down a notch and, if they're concerned about someone being an active threat or something, work on coming up with some sort of solution that isn't going to make things worse as soon as it's done?
[This is not the first time he's had to go into this discussion while here--or at home--and so that's why he's being extra short about it. He's also not just talking about the recent incident, it's simply what prompted him to say something this time.]
Okay, I wish I could say that I can't believe I have to remind people of this, but vigilante justice is not exactly the best idea here. Not only is it morally wrong to just declare yourself to have the authority to decide who is and isn't deserving of 'justice', but it's logically wrong too; you're just going to cause problems, not solve them.
I'm not saying not to intervene when something's actively happening, but going after someone days or weeks later is just starting the whole process of retaliation all over again. So can everyone just take their egos down a notch and, if they're concerned about someone being an active threat or something, work on coming up with some sort of solution that isn't going to make things worse as soon as it's done?
[This is not the first time he's had to go into this discussion while here--or at home--and so that's why he's being extra short about it. He's also not just talking about the recent incident, it's simply what prompted him to say something this time.]

text; small miracles~
[Which he doesn't, okay. He never thought he'd say this, but he'd love to be wrong more often than he is because that would mean people weren't being idiots 24/7.]
text; the smallest
Point taken.
( But all snarking aside... )
Anyone got half an idea what to do about this?
( Because she's been here a long time and it's still... well. )
text;
[Which is always the worst.]
text;
( Sure, they could implement a legal system, but how long would that take? How many people would fight the very suggestion of it? How fucked are they if someone working on that is dragged back out?
And what if they do all of it only to have the Null, the Door, anything else interrupt it? )
text;
[Especially when it's hard to get worse than the current 'solution'.]
text;
( And what if you only have 59 reasons to say I told you so rather than 60, Lance? )
text;
[He's totally sure he could find more reasons; no one here is giving him any shortage of dumb things to criticize, after all. Including himself.]
text;
Good way to prove you're not violent.
( Is it hypocritical for her to call that sort of behaviour out? Most likely. But Kate's never been anything but a hypocrite. )
text;
What it is, I'm taking it as a good sign.
text;
That whoever did this hasn't attacked you?
( It's probably smart to lay low after it all, but she wonders nevertheless: where is the perpetrator? )
text;
[He's not... Hoping all that much, but still.]
text;
( Judging by the message, anyway. )
text;
[So it was sort of targeted, but not limited to that target by any means. It was definitely meant for everyone.]
text;
Probably were thinking, in that case.
text;
People come up with all sorts of reasons to justify their actions to themselves. I'm not saying that protecting people wasn't genuinely their intention, but if it was they didn't really think things out very well because they'd probably done the opposite.
It is a really convenient way to excuse their choices, though.
[And he's seen this a lot with vigilante types; they're really just about the power trip, and the claims of protecting people or making the world a better place are just justifications after the fact.]
text;
But not thinking things through isn't a condition unique to whoever caused this debate. )
Brings us back to the original argument, doesn't it? How do you keep people in line if you're not going to create laws?
( In this case, both the perpetrator and the... uh, iceblock? It's hard to really think of Caedra as a victim if the things people have said about her are true. )
text;
[He is a psychologist, after all, so positive reinforcement is always an option. But as far as consequences go, there are also plenty that can be done individually that don't require laws.]
text;
( Consequences don't stop everything — and wouldn't she know that — but they are a rather effective deterrent in most cases. )
text;
text;
Social options like...?
text;
Refusing to help her with projects, ignoring her posts to the network, not serving her alcohol, etc. There are a lot of ways to just make it not worth it to her to cause problems, especially if she's acting out of boredom.
text;
Could make it escalate.
( If she isn't given anything to do, what's to stop her from doing worse to get attention, or simply because she's bored? )
text;
[He's pretty sure it's far less; it's pretty much a done deal that there's going to be retaliation for this, after all.]
text;
( Hadriel's unique circumstances make it difficult, at best, to exact any sort of effective punishments, though. )
text;
text;